Bitcoin Bull Score Hits Zero for First Time Since 2022 Bear Market as Momentum Indicators Flash Warning

Bitcoin Bull Score has collapsed to zero for the first time since January 2022—the period immediately preceding the cryptocurrency’s descent into a prolonged bear market that saw prices decline from near $70,000 to lows below $16,000. The composite metric, which integrates ten distinct on-chain and market indicators to assess Bitcoin’s upward potential and market health, registered this alarming reading on Thursday according to data from CryptoQuant, signaling that momentum has cooled entirely across multiple dimensions simultaneously.

What makes this development particularly concerning is that the zero reading occurs while Bitcoin trades near the psychologically significant $100,000 level—a price point that would typically suggest strong market conditions. This disconnect between elevated price and deteriorating underlying metrics creates unusual situation where Bitcoin maintains nominal strength while the structural supports that typically sustain bull markets have eroded to levels last seen before major corrections.

Understanding the Bull Score Composite Metric

The Bull Score represents a comprehensive attempt to quantify Bitcoin’s market health through a single numeric indicator ranging from 0 to 10, where higher values indicate stronger bullish conditions and lower values suggest bearish environments. The metric achieves this synthesis by integrating ten distinct on-chain and market indicators across four fundamental categories that together capture the multidimensional nature of cryptocurrency market dynamics.

These four categories include Network Activity metrics that measure transaction volumes, active addresses, and blockchain usage patterns indicating genuine economic activity versus speculation. Volume measurements track both spot and derivatives trading activity that provides liquidity and enables price discovery. Investor Profitability indicators assess whether holders sit on gains or losses, influencing their propensity to sell or hold. Market Liquidity factors evaluate the availability of capital to absorb selling pressure or fund purchases, including stablecoin reserves and exchange balances.

The composite nature of the Bull Score makes it more robust than single indicators because it requires deterioration across multiple dimensions simultaneously before registering extreme readings. A score of zero doesn’t merely indicate weakness in one area but rather comprehensive breakdown across all ten component indicators—a condition suggesting systemic rather than isolated problems.

Interpreting Bull Score Thresholds

The Bull Score framework establishes specific thresholds for market regime identification: readings below 40 signal bear market conditions where downside risks dominate and caution is warranted, while scores exceeding 60 indicate bull market environments where upside momentum prevails and risk-taking finds reward. The intermediate range between 40-60 represents transitional or neutral conditions where neither bulls nor bears demonstrate clear control.

The current zero reading falls dramatically below even the bearish threshold of 40, placing Bitcoin in territory that historically preceded or accompanied major corrections. While the score remained extremely low throughout the 2022 bear market as Bitcoin declined from $70,000 to $16,000, the current context differs fundamentally because price has not yet experienced comparable collapse—creating disconnect that raises questions about whether the metrics are leading indicators forecasting coming decline or whether structural changes in markets have altered the relationship between these indicators and price.

All Ten Components Register Below-Trend Readings

The comprehensive nature of the Bull Score’s collapse manifests through all ten component indicators simultaneously registering below-trend readings—a rare occurrence that suggests broad-based deterioration rather than weakness isolated to specific market segments. This universal weakness across diverse metrics that measure different aspects of market health creates particularly concerning signal because it eliminates the possibility that compensating strengths in some areas offset weaknesses in others.

Network Activity metrics showing below-trend readings indicate that blockchain usage—measured through transaction counts, active addresses, and data throughput—has declined from recent averages. This suggests reduced economic activity using Bitcoin for actual transactions, payments, or transfers beyond mere speculation. When network activity declines, it raises questions about whether Bitcoin’s utility is maintaining pace with its price appreciation or whether valuation has become divorced from fundamental usage.

Volume indicators falling below trend signal that trading activity—both spot market transactions and derivatives positions—has declined from levels that sustained previous price action. Reduced volume often precedes or accompanies corrections because it indicates diminishing participation and liquidity that makes markets more vulnerable to price manipulation or sudden moves on modest capital deployment.

Investor Profitability metrics below trend suggest that fewer holders sit on substantial unrealized gains, reducing the risk of profit-taking selling but also indicating that the bullish sentiment and wealth effect that typically drive continued buying have weakened. When holders aren’t experiencing significant gains, the psychological reinforcement that encourages further accumulation and risk-taking diminishes.

Market Liquidity factors showing weakness indicate that capital available to fund purchases or absorb selling pressure has contracted, making markets more fragile and susceptible to volatility in either direction. Limited liquidity means that modest selling pressure can move prices substantially because insufficient buying interest exists to absorb supply at current levels.

MVRV Ratio Decline Signals Reduced Profitability

Among the ten component indicators, the Market Value to Realized Value ratio has experienced particularly dramatic decline over the past month, contributing significantly to the Bull Score’s collapse. MVRV compares Bitcoin’s current market capitalization to its realized capitalization—the latter representing the aggregate value of all coins at the price they last moved on-chain, effectively capturing the average acquisition cost basis across all holders.

When MVRV ratio drops, it indicates that current market value is approaching or falling below the average cost basis of holders, meaning investors collectively hold less unrealized profit or are even slipping into aggregate losses. This development typically signals reduced investor profitability that influences holder behavior—participants sitting on modest or negative returns demonstrate less conviction and higher propensity to sell during weakness compared to those enjoying substantial gains.

The declining MVRV can be interpreted multiple ways depending on context and timeframe. In some scenarios, MVRV approaching or falling below 1.0—where market value equals realized value—identifies potential undervaluation zones where risk-reward becomes favorable for new entries. Historical analysis shows Bitcoin often finds bottoms when MVRV declines to levels suggesting most holders are near breakeven or underwater.

However, declining MVRV from elevated levels can also indicate that a rally’s sustainability is questioned as the unrealized gains that supported continued buying and holding erode. When MVRV rises during bull markets, it reflects growing profits that create wealth effects encouraging further accumulation. The reversal of this dynamic as MVRV declines suggests the psychological and financial supports for continued rally have weakened.

The current MVRV decline occurring while Bitcoin maintains prices near $100,000—substantially above the levels where most long-term holders accumulated—creates unusual situation. Historically, declining MVRV at elevated prices has signaled market tops where distribution begins as holders realize profits. Whether current decline represents similar distribution or simply consolidation within ongoing bull market remains the critical question the Bull Score’s collapse raises.

Stablecoin Liquidity Collapse Limits Buying Power

The dramatic plunge in stablecoin liquidity on the Bitcoin network represents another critical factor driving the Bull Score to zero. Stablecoin liquidity measures the amount of dollar-equivalent digital currency available on exchanges and in wallets that can be quickly deployed to purchase Bitcoin without requiring traditional banking transfers or fiat currency on-ramps.

Stablecoins function as the primary bridge between traditional currency and cryptocurrency markets, allowing traders to maintain dollar-denominated positions ready for instant deployment into Bitcoin or other crypto assets. When stablecoin balances on exchanges are high, it indicates substantial “dry powder” exists that could fund buying if opportunities arise. Conversely, depleted stablecoin reserves suggest limited immediate buying power available to absorb selling pressure or drive prices higher.

The collapse in stablecoin liquidity over the past month suggests that capital has either exited cryptocurrency markets entirely—converting stablecoins back to fiat and withdrawing from exchanges—or has been fully deployed into positions leaving minimal reserves ready for additional purchases. Either scenario creates vulnerability where selling pressure faces limited buying interest to maintain prices.

This liquidity crunch helps explain why Bitcoin has struggled to break decisively above $100,000 despite multiple attempts. Without fresh stablecoin inflows providing new buying power, existing market participants must continuously bid against each other using finite capital. This zero-sum dynamic eventually exhausts buyers and allows sellers to dominate, particularly when profit-taking from successful positions depletes the capital that funded initial purchases.

ETF and Corporate Inflow Slowdown Drives Momentum Loss

Analysts identify slowing exchange-traded fund and corporate Bitcoin acquisitions as the primary driver explaining why the Bull Score has collapsed despite Bitcoin maintaining elevated prices. ETF inflows and corporate treasury purchases represented the dominant demand source during 2024’s advance, with billions in capital entering Bitcoin through these institutional channels that provided consistent bid support and positive narrative momentum.

When these institutional flows dominated, they created conditions where Bull Score components naturally registered strong readings: trading volume remained elevated as ETFs facilitated large transactions, liquidity was ample as institutional capital continuously entered markets, investor profitability improved as sustained buying drove prices higher, and network activity increased as these large flows moved through exchanges and custody solutions.

The slowdown or pause in these institutional flows removes the primary catalyst that sustained the advance and supported the underlying metrics. Without new ETF inflows adding billions in fresh capital monthly, the market lacks the buying power necessary to absorb profit-taking from existing holders or drive prices to new highs. Corporate treasury purchases that previously generated headlines and encouraged retail participation have similarly diminished as companies complete initial allocation targets or pause programs amid market uncertainty.

This institutional demand slowdown creates particularly challenging environment because retail participation alone rarely provides sufficient capital to sustain rallies at Bitcoin’s current market capitalization. The cryptocurrency has grown too large for retail-driven rallies to move markets substantially—institutional participation has become necessary condition for major advances, meaning its absence creates natural ceiling on upside potential.

Structural Difference From 2022 Bear Market

While the Bull Score hitting zero matches conditions from January 2022, critical structural differences between current situation and the 2022 bear market complicate direct comparisons and forecasting based solely on pattern matching. Most significantly, Bitcoin currently trades near $100,000—roughly 5x higher than the $20,000 level where the 2022 bear market began and 6x above the $16,000 bottom reached later that year.

This price elevation suggests either that Bitcoin has established a permanently higher valuation floor supported by institutional adoption and broader acceptance, or that current prices are significantly overextended relative to underlying fundamentals and will eventually correct toward levels more consistent with the deteriorated Bull Score metrics.

The 2022 bear market unfolded against backdrop of collapsing DeFi protocols, exchange failures including FTX, and widespread fraud revelations that destroyed confidence and forced massive deleveraging. Current market conditions lack comparable catastrophic events or systemic fraud, instead reflecting more gradual momentum loss as institutional buying slows and retail interest wanes.

Additionally, the cryptocurrency infrastructure and institutional presence have evolved substantially since 2022. Regulated spot ETFs now provide legitimate institutional access that didn’t exist during the previous cycle, corporate treasury adoption has established precedent that makes similar strategies more acceptable, and regulatory frameworks have advanced even if uncertainty persists.

These structural improvements could mean that Bull Score collapse doesn’t necessarily forecast the 80%+ decline that followed in 2022, instead potentially indicating extended consolidation or modest correction before institutional flows resume. However, they could alternatively represent factors that have artificially supported prices above levels justified by actual demand and usage—creating conditions where eventual mean reversion proves particularly severe.

Early Bear Market Transition Warning

Analysts characterizing current conditions as resembling “early bear-market transition” rather than mid-bull-market consolidation represents significant shift in professional assessment of Bitcoin’s trajectory. This framing suggests that the institutional and structural supports that sustained the advance from 2023 lows have eroded to point where the uptrend’s continuation appears unlikely without material change in circumstances.

Early bear market transitions typically feature several characteristics that current conditions display: prices maintain relatively elevated levels as participants remain in denial about trend change, volume and participation decline as enthusiastic buyers exhaust while sellers haven’t yet panicked, valuation metrics deteriorate while nominal prices lag this deterioration, and optimism about imminent recovery prevents the capitulation that marks actual bottoms.

The warning that “immediate action is required to avoid a prolonged slump” reflects urgency analysts perceive in current setup. The longer Bull Score components remain at zero without recovery in underlying metrics or price correction that brings valuation in line with fundamentals, the greater the risk that extended consolidation or substantial correction becomes necessary to reset conditions for eventual sustainable advance.

What “Immediate Action” Means

The call for immediate action implicitly addresses institutional participants, policymakers, and market infrastructure providers who have capacity to influence the demand and liquidity conditions that drive Bull Score components. For Bitcoin to avoid prolonged weakness, the analysis suggests several developments need to materialize quickly.

Resumed institutional ETF inflows would provide the consistent demand necessary to absorb profit-taking and support higher prices while improving volume and liquidity metrics. Corporate treasury programs reaccelerating would generate positive narratives and demonstrate that sophisticated capital allocators maintain conviction in Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition.

Regulatory clarity that removes uncertainty constraining institutional participation could unlock capital that remains on sidelines due to compliance concerns or ambiguous legal status. New use cases or adoption metrics demonstrating Bitcoin’s utility beyond speculation would support network activity indicators and provide fundamental justification for elevated valuations.

Without such catalysts materializing relatively quickly, the analysis suggests Bitcoin faces extended period of sideways trading or gradual decline as the disconnect between zero Bull Score and $100,000 price gradually resolves through either metric recovery or price correction.

Extended Consolidation Scenario

The most likely outcome given current conditions involves extended consolidation where Bitcoin trades in a relatively wide range for months while underlying metrics gradually improve and market structure repairs from recent momentum loss. This scenario avoids both the bearish outcome of major correction and the bullish case of rapid resumption of uptrend, instead representing a middle path where neither bulls nor bears achieve decisive victory.

Extended consolidation would allow several necessary processes to unfold: profit-taking from successful positions to complete as those wishing to exit at elevated prices do so, valuation metrics to improve as prices stabilize rather than advance unsustainably, new institutional participants to evaluate opportunities and potentially enter at what they perceive as reasonable valuations after correction fears prove overblown, and technical repairs including base-building and moving average convergence to establish foundation for eventual breakout.

Historical precedent shows Bitcoin often experiences multi-month consolidation phases following major advances, particularly when institutional participation increases as it has recently. These consolidations serve healthy function of distributing supply from early buyers to new participants and establishing support levels that provide foundation for next leg higher.

However, extended consolidation also carries risks including holder exhaustion where participants lose patience and exit positions, opportunity cost as capital could generate returns elsewhere during dead money periods, and momentum loss that makes eventual recovery require stronger catalysts than if advance had continued without interruption.

Bull Score Recovery Requirements

For the Bull Score to recover from zero toward bullish territory above 60, substantial improvements must materialize across multiple component indicators simultaneously. The comprehensive nature of current weakness means that isolated improvements in one or two metrics won’t significantly move the composite score—broad-based recovery across network activity, volume, profitability, and liquidity is required.

Network activity improvement would require actual increase in Bitcoin blockchain usage for transactions, payments, smart contract interactions, or other economic purposes beyond speculation. This demands either new use cases achieving meaningful adoption or existing applications scaling substantially—neither of which occurs quickly even under favorable conditions.

Volume recovery necessitates renewed trading interest from participants who have recently been inactive or new entrants providing fresh capital. This typically requires either significant price movement in either direction that attracts momentum traders, or compelling narratives that draw attention and encourage participation from broader audiences.

Investor profitability enhancement through MVRV recovery would result from either prices advancing substantially above current levels increasing unrealized gains, or time passing such that more coins change hands at higher average prices raising the realized value denominator. The former requires the very rally that Bull Score weakness suggests is unlikely, while the latter unfolds slowly.

Liquidity restoration demands stablecoin inflows returning to exchanges, institutional capital deploying through ETFs and other vehicles, or existing holders recapitalizing accounts to have reserves ready for purchases. Each of these sources faces constraints including waning retail interest, institutional caution, and holders having already deployed available capital.

The chicken-and-egg nature of these requirements creates challenging recovery dynamics—the improvements necessary to restore Bull Score often require the very price strength and positive momentum that low Bull Score suggests won’t occur. Breaking this circularity typically requires external catalyst or capitulation event that resets expectations and creates conditions for fresh start.

Risk Management in Zero Bull Score Environment

The Bull Score hitting zero creates environment where defensive positioning and heightened risk management become appropriate regardless of individual conviction in Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory. While the metric doesn’t guarantee immediate substantial decline, it does indicate that the underlying supports for continued rally have eroded to concerning levels.

For existing holders, the zero reading argues for evaluating whether position sizes, cost bases, and time horizons align with potential for extended consolidation or correction rather than assuming the bull market will continue indefinitely. Holders might consider taking some profits to reduce exposure while maintaining core positions, tightening stop losses to protect against breakdown scenarios, or simply accepting increased volatility and potential paper losses as the price of maintaining long-term positions.

For prospective buyers, zero Bull Score suggests that rushing to establish positions carries elevated risk given deteriorated underlying metrics. Better opportunities might materialize either at lower prices if correction occurs, or after Bull Score begins recovering indicating that fundamental conditions are improving. Patience and selectivity become virtues in environments where momentum has evaporated.

For active traders, zero Bull Score creates environment favoring range-trading approaches that profit from volatility within consolidation rather than directional strategies expecting sustained trends. The lack of momentum suggested by the metric argues for reduced position sizes, wider stops, and quicker profit-taking given that extended moves in either direction appear less probable.

Historical Context and Pattern Reliability

While the January 2022 precedent provides concerning comparison point, evaluating the Bull Score’s historical reliability and false signal rate remains important for contextualizing current reading. Single historic instance of zero reading preceding major bear market doesn’t establish robust statistical pattern—it represents n=1 sample size that might or might not prove predictive in current different structural environment.

The metric’s designers presumably backtested the Bull Score against historical Bitcoin price action to validate its signals and optimize component weightings and thresholds. However, cryptocurrency markets evolve rapidly with new participants, instruments, and dynamics that weren’t present in historical periods used for backtesting. The introduction of spot ETFs, for instance, represents structural change that might alter relationships between underlying metrics and price behavior.

Additionally, the self-referential nature of widely-watched indicators can influence their reliability—when many market participants monitor the same metrics and adjust positioning based on their signals, it creates feedback loops where the indicators become self-fulfilling or alternatively where their predictive value diminishes as everyone positions the same way.

The proper interpretation of zero Bull Score likely falls somewhere between dismissing it entirely as one indicator among many versus treating it as infallible prediction of coming bear market. It represents concerning deterioration in multiple underlying metrics that historically preceded weakness, yet operates within unique current context that might produce different outcomes than simple pattern matching would suggest.

Monitoring for Bull Score Recovery or Further Deterioration

In coming weeks and months, tracking whether the Bull Score remains at zero, recovers toward neutral or bullish territory, or whether price corrects to align with the metric will provide critical information about whether current disconnect between deteriorated metrics and elevated price resolves through metric recovery or price decline.

If institutional flows resume and stablecoin liquidity returns to exchanges while network activity picks up, it would signal that the zero reading represented temporary trough before recovery rather than early stage of extended weakness. Such scenario would validate continued holding or even adding to positions as the metrics confirm strength.

If Bull Score remains at zero for extended period while price gradually declines or consolidates sideways, it would confirm that the metric successfully identified loss of momentum that plays out through time rather than immediate collapse. This scenario argues for patience and defensive positioning while monitoring for eventual recovery signals.

If price were to break down substantially while Bull Score remains at zero, it would represent the metric successfully forecasting coming weakness in advance—though the lack of advance warning time between signal and decline would limit its utility for risk management purposes.

For now, the zero Bull Score reading serves as clear warning that Bitcoin’s underlying market health has deteriorated to levels not seen since 2022, requiring heightened caution and defensive positioning until conditions improve or price corrects to levels more consistent with fundamentals.

Missed buying crypto at the market bottom?

No worries, there's a chance to win in crypto casinos! Practice for free and win cryptocurrency in recommended casinos! Our website wheretospin.com offers not only the best casino reviews but also the opportunity to win big amounts in exciting games.

Join now and start your journey to financial freedom with WhereToSpin!

Middle East

wheretospininkuwait.com provides a comprehensive selection of trusted online casino reviews for the Middle East أفضل كازينو على الإنترنت. The platform features well-established casinos supporting crypto deposits in the region, including Dream Bet, Haz Casino, Emirbet, YYY Casino, and Casinia.

South Africa and New Zealand

In the South African online casino market, wheretospin.co.za highlights top-rated platforms and online casinos such as True Fortune Casino and DuckyLuck. Meanwhile, for New Zealand players, wheretospin.nz showcases highly recommended casinos, including Casinia, Rooster.bet, and Joo Casino.